Skip to main content

Your internet browser is out of date and not supported by this website. For the best viewing experience on wool.com, please update your browser to one of the options below.

Mozilla Firefox Google Chrome Safari Microsoft Edge
AWEX EMI 1565 +112
Micron 17 2283 +205
Micron 18 2115 +150
Micron 19 1931 +151
Micron 20 1825 +137
Micron 21 1776 +106
Micron 25 1038n +60
Micron 26 950 +75
Micron 28 735 +65
Micron 30 598n +23
Micron 32 492n +27
Micron 16.5 2327 +195
MCar 791 +7

Merino Lifetime Productivity

AWI and Australian Merino Sire Evaluation Association (AMSEA) have teamed up with five sire evaluation sites to deliver the AWI Merino Lifetime Productivity (MLP) Project between 2015-25.

AWI and Australian Merino Sire Evaluation Association (AMSEA) have teamed up with five sire evaluation sites, site hosts and nominating stud breeders, to deliver the AWI Merino Lifetime Productivity Project (MLP). The project will receive $8 million dollars in funding from AWI over ten years from 2015, along with $5 million in support from project partners.

The 10-year project is designed to capture lifetime data across diverse environments and Merino types to help better understand and deliver Merino ewe lifetime performance outcomes for the Australian Merino industry.

AWI hosted a national webinar in mid-July 2025 to provide an update to all outcomes we currently know from the AWI MLP project. AWI is committed to providing regular updates to release what we know as soon as it’s completed. View the full webinar below.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

The Merino Lifetime Productivity (MLP) project has generated an unprecedented dataset for the Merino industry. Analysis of this vast dataset is well underway, and these FAQs present the background of the project and some of the initial findings. They provide valuable insights into age of assessment, the economic drivers of lifetime productivity, and the tools that can be used to deliver productivity. However, it is important to note that analysis is ongoing, and further refinements will continue to emerge. 

The teams analysing the data are now generating outputs that address the core questions MLP was designed to answer.  Current areas of work include: 

  • Developing full genetic parameter estimates across traits.  
  • Improving methods for predicting adult trait performance at young ages
  • Conducting economic analyses, including gross margin per dry sheep equivalent (DSE) and profit per hectare, and exploring their correlation with genetic indexes.
  • Undertaking a benefit–cost analysis of visual and measured assessments. 

The findings presented here should therefore be seen as early outcomes, which will be strengthened as peer review, economic modelling, and further data analysis continue through to 2026.

  • MLP, which commenced in 2015, is a $13 million collaboration between Australian Wool Innovation (AWI), Australian Merino Sire Evaluation Association (AMSEA), ram breeders, and five sire evaluation sites. 
  • It tracked 5,700 ewes (daughters of 134 sires) across four to five joinings and annual shearings, generating over two million lifetime records.
  • The project was designed to address a key gap in Merino breeding: understanding how early-life selection decisions translate into whole-of-life productivity (wool, carcase, reproduction, and survival).
  • Further analysis of the data will continue through 2026. 

When the AWI Board approved the project in 2015, it was on the basis of a set of clear objectives designed to address long-standing gaps in Merino breeding research. These objectives were to:  

  • Add significant adult data to improve the accuracy of lifetime productivity predictions.
  • Better predict lifetime performance from young-age measurements.
  • Define correlations between key lifetime performance traits, such as wool, reproduction, and survival.
  • Compare the cost and accuracy of visual classing versus objective assessments at young ages and track their effectiveness through repeat annual lifetime measurements.
  • Develop new breeding values (e.g. for survival traits).
  • Compare index performance against economic returns to ensure that selection tools align with real profitability.  
  • Enhance genomic reference populations to improve the accuracy and accessibility of genomic breeding technologies for the Merino industry. 

The MLP sites were chosen through a rigorous, structured process designed to ensure that each site could deliver robust and high-quality data while representing the diversity of Australia’s Merino production systems.  

  • The five sites (Balmoral, VIC; Pingelly, WA; MerinoLink, NSW; Macquarie, NSW; and New England, NSW) represented a broad cross-section of Australian Merino production environments, from high rainfall to Mediterranean, slopes/plains to tablelands.  
  • The variety of sites chosen allowed the project to assess how different genetics perform across contrasting environments and management systems.
  • Each site had an experienced local committee actively involved in sire evaluation, ensuring protocol compliance and valuable industry input. 
  • A high-quality, well-balanced ewe base was also essential so that data collected would be representative and minimally biased.  
  • The strategic and repeated use of selected “link sires” across multiple MLP sites and joining years created strong genetic linkage within the project. This enabled data from each site to be accurately adjusted for environmental and management differences and then combined to create the MLP dataset. 
  • Linkage was also deliberately established with the national MERINOSELECT genetic evaluation system, which enabled the MLP project dataset to be used to strengthen both the routine analysis and the Merino genomic reference population, leading to more reliable breeding values.

The MLP project dataset was completed in July 2024 and included a comprehensive range of annual lifetime visual, objective, and classing assessments, covering: 

  • Wool traits – fleece weight, fibre diameter, staple strength, yield, character, fleece rot, colour, and other related fleece quality traits. 
  • Growth and carcase traits – liveweight, eye muscle depth, fat depth, and condition score. 
  • Reproduction traits – pregnancy status, litter size, weaning rates, and ewe rearing ability. 
  • Health and welfare traits – worm egg count, breech and wrinkle traits, feet, udder and teats, teeth and structure. 
  • Genomic data – all F1 ewes were genotyped with a 50K SNP chip. 
  • Each site called for nominations from ram breeders across Australia, encouraging a wide range of Merino types, breeding philosophies and performance.   
  • Nominated sires were evaluated against agreed selection principles to ensure they were industry representative and relevant. 
  • The project aimed to have a balance of horn/poll, mix of skin types, high-use sires, show winners, sires with high semen sales, young and proven sires, and a range in performance for key production traits. 
  • Sires with ASBVs were drawn from across four main MERINOSELECT genetic groups, with an additional group outside these categories. They were chosen in proportion to their frequency in the national flock to ensure the project reflected the diversity of Merino breeding so that the MLP outcomes were representative of the breadth of genetics available to Australian Merino breeders. The groups were: 
    • wool-focused sires 
    • high-indexing sires 
    • meat-focused sires 
    • specialist fine wool sires 
    • plus a smaller “other” group that did not fit within these categories. 
  • In addition, some sires were funded by AWI to be involved to fill specific performance gaps, while others were funded to create genetic linkage between sites. 
  • A Sire Advisory Group (SAG) was established to identify rams with strong industry impact. Specifically, the SAG focused on selecting sires that had performed well in shows and multi-vendor sales, ensuring the inclusion of animals with proven relevance and visibility across the industry. This helped strengthen the comprehensiveness and credibility of the sire evaluation within the MLP project. 
  • Final sire listings were confirmed with the site committees, the MLP project executive and the project's Industry Steering Committee, ensuring broad input and alignment with project objectives. 
  • MLP findings show that, regardless of whether you are using a classer or objective data, assessments made at 18–22 months (late Hogget/early Adult age) are much more predictive of lifetime wool production and progeny performance than assessments at 9–12 months (Post-Weaning or Yearling).  
  • This is because sheep are still maturing at younger ages, and early measures can be confounded by growth, nutrition, and environmental factors. Relying too heavily on early-age data risks reduced accuracy in selection and can misrepresent an animal’s true productivity potential. 
  • Later assessments smooth out the ‘noise’ of early-life environmental variation and better reflect future potential.
  • Later-age assessments (18–22 months) have proven to be stronger predictors of lifetime performance - particularly for key fleece traits - with classing at this stage showing a closer alignment to whole-of-life productivity outcomes.  
  • The trade-off is that delaying selection to this stage can increase measurement and management costs and may lengthen generation intervals. 
  • Early findings from the MLP project demonstrate that genomic testing can significantly improve the accuracy of early-age predictions, helping to offset the limitations of young-age measurements and reducing the cost–accuracy trade-off.  
  • Breeders need to balance:
     
    • The additional cost, logistical complexity, and potential generation interval impacts of later-age measurement or the use of genomics, against 
    • The reduced accuracy and increased risk of mis-selection when relying solely on early or partial-drop data.  
  • For commercial breeders, the practical application is to make selection decisions as late as is operationally and economically feasible, ideally just before a ewe's first joining to maximise prediction accuracy.  
  • For ram breeders, an optimal strategy may be a combined approach, integrating:
    • early-age measurement and classing of rams 
    • genomic testing
    • later-age assessment of retained stock and hogget (18–22 months of age) ewes. 
       
  • Across the project, there is generally good alignment between visual grades and production-based indexes (e.g. MP+), but: 
    • Some top indexing animals have poor conformation.
    • Some top visually classed animals have low indexes. 
  • This confirms that each method can miss important traits that the other captures. 
  • MLP confirmed that: 
    • Visual classing is cost-effective and accurate for traits that can be observed (e.g. fleece weight and body weight).
    • However, visual classing has lower accuracy for less visually obvious traits such as carcase traits, disease resistance, and other welfare traits.
    • Across most sites, ewes with higher lifetime reproduction rates were classed down later in life due to the impact of reproduction, highlighting the importance of reproduction records when classing older ewes.  
    • ASBVs and index-based selection are effective for non-visual traits and when breeding objectives involve multiple antagonistic traits (e.g. balancing fleece weight, fibre diameter, reproduction and worm resistance).    

  • Integrating both visual classing and objective measurements allows breeders to capture the benefits of each system, ensuring that genetic gain is optimised while improving structure and wool quality. 
  • For the sires evaluated in the project, both groups produced high-performing sires, but with different strengths: 
    • Non-ASBV sires evaluated in the project: on average, higher in traits that can be more readily assessed visually such as fleece weight. 
    • ASBV sires evaluated in the project: stronger in traits that are less easily observed, such as reproduction, worm resistance, and carcase and eating quality traits. 
  • This validates that both pathways can produce productive sires, but the trait emphasis can differ depending on the tools used. 
  • Beyond trait heritability and genetic insights, MLP delivered important practical lessons for better management of selection and classing on-farm to maximise accuracy and consistency. Key considerations include: 
    • Around 25% of commercial woolgrowers do not class sheep, which leaves significant potential gains unrealised. The project showed classing at the Hogget or Adult stage provides a strong option for those commercial flocks, offering a balance of cost and accuracy. 
    • Small management groups make both visual classing and data analysis less reliable. Where possible, run sheep as larger groups to reduce variation between groups and improve the accuracy of data collection. 
    • Assistance from data managers or service providers can improve consistency, record-keeping, and rigour in both visual and measured assessments. 
    • Classing adult ewes following weaning requires caution, as reproductive effort can temporarily alter body condition and wool traits, potentially biasing decisions. 
    • Incorporating at least one hogget or adult fleece weight into selection programs significantly improves the accuracy of predicting lifetime wool production. In contrast, reproduction traits require multiple years of repeated data to achieve reliable genetic predictions. 

  • The key message is that good protocols and management design matter as much as the tools chosen (visual and objective measurements). Rigorous, well-structured assessments lead to stronger selection outcomes, while shortcuts and inconsistent application compromise accuracy and confidence. 
  • The late Professor Andrew Swan's work on the MLP reproduction analysis was a stimulus behind the creation of the new MERINOSELECT reproduction analysis, which now incorporates the component traits of reproduction.  
  • The new reproduction analysis produces Weaning Rate (WR) ASBVs and its three component traits: Conception (CON), Litter Size (LS) and Ewe Rearing Ability (ERA).  
  • MLP’s extensive lifetime dataset, comprising more than 20,000 weaning rate records from 4,800+ ewes was important to the establishment and delivery of the new genomically enhanced analysis.  
  • Analysis has shown that accurate sire breeding values for WR require data from at least two joinings of daughters, and that accuracy improves further with more ewe progeny per sire, especially when genomic data is absent.
  • Inclusion of genomic data greatly improved accuracy for lowheritability reproduction traits, enabling reliable estimates from fewer progeny and reproduction events.  
  • Fat and muscle are lowly correlated with WR, so direct selection for WR is preferable to using fat depth as a proxy.  
  • The project’s use of syndicate joinings to generate reproduction records showed wide variation in ram mating success, with the top 20% of rams siring more than eight times as many progeny as the bottom 20% across sites. 
  • Being born and or reared as a twin generally disadvantages a sheep in terms of early growth, body weight and visual classing grade, and these effects can carry through to later assessments if not accounted for.  However, sire rankings for most measured traits remain consistent after adjusting for birth type, meaning the effect is primarily environmental rather than genetic. The project’s data confirms the importance of accounting for birth/rear type in both on-farm selection and genetic evaluations. 
  • An early survival analysis from birth to four years of age showed that survival had low heritability (~0.06) but showed significant sire variation. It was favourably correlated with wrinkle (0.4), meaning that genetically plainer ewes tend to have higher survival rates. 
  • This analysis is being updated to include ewe survival data out to six and seven years of age. 
  • Alongside the core MLP data collection, a series of MLP Add-On projects were undertaken, leveraging the project livestock and extending the value of the dataset, to investigate traits of growing importance to industry.
  • These projects demonstrated that MLP could deliver insights well beyond wool and reproduction, tackling areas of animal welfare, carcase and eating quality, efficiency, and sustainability. 
  • Projects showed that: 
    • Udder and teat structure is heritable (0.23 to 0.36) and strongly influences lamb survival and weaning weight. Poor udders reduced lamb survival, supporting the inclusion of udder/teat scores into the Visual Sheep Scores and eventually ASBVs. 
    • Genetic selection for reduced flystrike risk is now possible, accelerating welfare outcomes. 
    • Skin pigmentation at young ages predicted lifetime pigment expression, supporting early selection for this trait. 
    • Yield accuracy was highest with mid-side sampling, even under drought conditions. 
    • Preliminary Methane Project Breeding Values (PBVs), with 15% of national phenotype coming from MLP ewes, showed moderate heritability (~0.19) and generally unfavourable genetic correlations with body weight and fleece weight (~0.2), requiring careful balancing in indexes. 
    • Resilience (immune competence) has moderate heritability (~0.38), with small associations with production traits. This suggests breeders can target resilience directly without compromising wool traits. 
  •  
  • Further work on flystrike resistance, body fat efficiency, pigmentation, and footrot resistance is also expanding the range of genetic tools available to Merino breeders. 
  • Preliminary gross margin analyses suggest Indexes need greater emphasis on Adult Fleece Weight.  
  • Profit per hectare analysis (due late 2025) will integrate wool, reproduction, and methane traits.  
  • These analyses will guide refinement of MERINOSELECT Indexes and breeding strategies. 
  • No single trait dominated. The most profitable animals combined:
     
    • High fleece weight (wool income driver). 
    • Strong reproduction (higher weaning rate). 
    • Good resilience/survival traits (lower loss rates, welfare benefits). 
  • Which trait matters most depends on the environment and enterprise mix. 
  • Outputs include:  
    • 31 site reports (11,600+ downloads), seven podcasts, 18 newsletters, 33 Beyond the Bale articles, 23 field events (2,155 attendees).
    • Updated extension content and tools, including updates to the Visual Sheep Scores Guide, AWI Flystrike Extension Program™, and AWI Picking Performer Ewes™.
    • MLP Add-On projects (e.g., footrot, resilience, methane) continue to deliver practical tools. 
  • Scientific outputs: 25 papers published, 29 more underway. 
  • Economic analyses: Profit/ha results due late 2025. 
  • Extension: Final MLP site field days in 2026; resources tailored for different production systems. 
  • Continued collaboration between scientists and ram breeders for shaping next-generation breeding Indexes. 

MLP Project Sites & Partners

Download the Project Brochure

Read more about the Merino Lifetime Productivity Project in the MLP brochure (PDF 696 KB)

Download PDF

MLP Sites, Sires and More Information

Visit the Merino Lifetime Productivity Project page on the Merino Superior Sires website to find out more about the project’s aims, evaluation sites, the sires and ewes involved and to access project reports.

Visit Website

Download MLP Reports

MLP Reports including raw data, adjusted sire means, breeding values and indexes are produced annually for each site. They can be downloaded from the Merino Superior Sires website.

Download Reports

The project is an opportunity to answer many of the industry’s questions in relation to selection and ewe lifetime performance, such as:

  • Is it possible to select for lifetime productivity at a young age using raw data, breeding values, genomically enhanced breeding values, visual classing or a combination of industry approaches?
  • What is the impact of selecting for wool, growth, reproduction, welfare and carcase traits on the productivity of Merino ewes over their lifetime?
  • Why do some animals perform year in and year out, while others fade over time?
  • Are there new ways to better predict superior lifetime performance?

MLP Newsletter:

MLP Project Updates:

Merino Superior Sires:

MLP Beyond the Bale Articles:

LISTEN ABOUT THE MERINO LIFETIME PRODUCTIVITY PROJECT ON AWI'S PODCAST 'THE YARN'

Gaining genetic ground with an MLP milestone - episode 129

The Merino Lifetime Productivity (MLP) Project has reached its halfway mark, so what does this mean for the commercial and stud breeders of Australia's wool industry?

Listen Now

Merino Lifetime Productivity Project Update episode 86

Four years into the ten-year long MLP Project, the industry experts from the MLP Industry Steering Committee share the successes of the project so far and the outcomes the industry hopes to see in the future.

Listen Now

Associated MLP “Add On” Projects

Read more on the list of MLP Add-On Projects (Add-on projects use the core MLP sheep for additional R&D but are separate to the core purpose of the MLP)

Download PDF
Download the Analysis and Reporting Plan Version 2

Read the MLP Analysis and Reporting Plan. Feedback welcome to Geoff.Lindon@wool.com


18/03/2020 MLP Analysis and Reporting Plan Version 2
 
Want to stay up to date with the Merino Lifetime Productivity Project?
Subscribe to the MLP newsletter:

Articles That Might Interest You

Breeding and Selection for Flystrike Resistance
Breeding for more flystrike resistant sheep plays a critical role in controlling flystrike in non-mulesed flocks as well as reducing the risk of flystrike in mulesed sheep. Read more
Genetic Evaluation
AWI provides genetic evaluation services to assist woolgrowers select sheep, including practical selection tools and benchmarking programs. Find out how to utilise these services. Read more
Lifetime Ewe Management
The nationally-accredited Lifetime Ewe Management course allows sheep producers to monitor and demonstrate the effects of nutrition and management on a mob of their own ewes in their environment. Read more
Grower Tools Flyboss WormBoss liceboss Timerite
Legal Contact Us Careers About AWI
Legal Contact Us Careers About AWI

Sitemap

On-Farm Research

Analgesia and Anaesthesia Footrot Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) facts and resources Parasite Management Latest Flystrike Publications AWI Flystrike Extension Program Current Flystrike Research Breech Modification Procedures Breeding and Selection for Flystrike Resistance Past Flystrike Prevention RD&E Updates Causal Web of Ovine Breech Flystrike Managing Chemical Resistance Flystrike Management Practices Education, Extension and Promotion Ewe Nutrition Best Practice Management Courses Feedbase Options Joining Lambing Dung Beetles Weaning Wool Harvesting Innovation Artificial Breeding Genetic Evaluation Merino Lifetime Productivity Biodiversity Soil Water Artificial Intelligence Farmers to Founders Rabbits Wild Dog Exclusion Fencing Wild Dogs, Foxes & Pigs Fibre Advocacy Wool and the Environment Richard Daugherty, ‘Balala’, New England Colin Seis, 'Winona', Central Tablelands Charlie and Anne Maslin, 'Gunningrah', Monaro Charles Massy, 'Severn Park', Monaro Tim Wright, 'Lana', Uralla Natural Capital Accounting Regenerative Techniques and Benefits Call For Proposals Ongoing R&D Genetics Training and Education

Training & Extension

Picking Performing Ewes AWI Repro Masterclass Grower Networks AWI Practical Workshops Shearing Shed Design Shed Safety Signage Kit Shearing Shed Safety Sheep Yards Modular sheep delivery unit to eliminate catch and drag Training Resources for Shearers & Woolhandlers Training Courses Clip Preparation Market Transparency Post-Farm Biosecurity Competitions and Support Best practice preparation for shearing Lifetime Ewe Management School Merino Wether Competitions AWI Breeding Leadership Nuffield Farming Scholarship Australian Rural Leadership Program Australian Wool Education Trust Making More From Sheep Stockmanship and Merino Visual Classing Workshop Material Bestprac Woolgrowers & COVID-19 Drought Resources Bushfires - Livestock Safety and Recovery Flood Recovery Resources Grower Menu Wool Harvesting Resources Hub

Market Intelligence

Weekly Price Reports Monthly Market Reports Wool Production Forecasts Sheep Numbers By State

News & Events

Industry News In the Shops In the Shops Archive The Yarn Podcast Events The Broader View Beyond the Bale Out and About

Sustainability

Woolmark+ Australian Wool Insetting Program

Woolmark Bale Stencil

About AWI

Governance Publications Board of Directors AWI Board Director Nomination Process Consultation AWI History Culture & Values Statutory Obligations Become a Shareholder Annual Reports 2021 Review of Performance 2018 Review of Performance ANAO Recommendations

Contact Us

AWI Offices Contact Form AWI Sponsorship Application

Careers

REDA From sheep to shop internship 2026 Internship Request Form Graduate Training Program Careers

Legal

Market Disclaimer Copyright Event Terms & Conditions Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookies

IWTO Congress 2025 Lille, France

Subscribe

Flock to Baggy Green

Land

Feed On Offer Pastures

Woolpoll 2024

WoolPoll Panel