Skip to main content

Your internet browser is out of date and not supported by this website. For the best viewing experience on wool.com, please update your browser to one of the options below.

AWEX EMI 1878 -12
Micron 17 2631 +8
Micron 18 2532 -
Micron 19 2312 -1
Micron 20 2099 -33
Micron 21 2019 -22
Micron 25 1225n -3
Micron 26 1105n -
Micron 28 870 +10
Micron 30 773 +10
Micron 16.5 2677 +13
MCar 1081 -9

Ewe nutrition directly influences reproductive efficiency and the lifetime performance of progeny. Nutritional setbacks—from joining through lambing, weaning, and back to pre-joining—reduces overall flock productivity. Condition scoring breeding ewes throughout this cycle is one of the key management tools available to producers.

Author: Alison Desmond, Project Leader, AWI Extension VIC & BestWool/BestLamb

Why condition score at joining matters 

Condition score remains the most reliable and practical tool for assessing and managing ewe nutritional status. Importantly, ewe condition score (CS) at conception—not the trend leading up to joining—is the primary driver of reproductive rate. 

Research across Merino and Maternal flocks illustrates that ewes in better CS at joining have more lambs. The graphs below show a near-linear increase in lambs conceived between CS 1.5 and 4.5. However, CS ≥ 4 elevates the risk of dystocia, so pushing ewes too far carries diminishing returns. 

The LifetimeWool project highlighted that Merino ewes on average conceive 20 extra lambs/100 ewes per additional CS at joining. 

inline1.jpg

 

Ewe response in conception rate to CS at joining varies widely (7–36% in the flocks studied in the LifetimeWool research), and is influenced by genetics, seasonal conditions and lambing time. Later lambing systems generally gain more value from lifting CS. 

The impact of CS at joining for Maternals is similar to Merinos, with an average of 24% more lambs for each additional CS at joining.   

inline2.jpg

Practical CS targets for ewes at joining 

  • Merinos: CS 3+
  • Maternals: CS 3.7+ 

Strategic timing: when it’s cheap to add condition 

Post-weaning is the most cost-effective period to build condition—particularly on green feed—before pressure on the feed base increases later in the reproductive cycle. 

Approaching joining, supplementary feeding is generally cost-effective for maintaining condition but far less efficient for gaining condition, especially under high feed prices. 

Which animals to prioritise? 

Post weaning, it is important to draft off thin ewes (<CS2) and preferentially feed them to ensure they can meet joining CS targets. In many cases those ewes in lower CS have mostly likely reared multiples. Twinning has a repeatability of ~15%, so investing in the recovery of proven twin-bearers maximises genetic and economic gains.  

Feed budgeting: plan ahead to avoid forced decisions 

  • Maintaining ewes at target CS requires forward planning—not reactive feeding. A solid feed budget allows you to: 
  • Identify feed gaps months ahead 
  • Allocate pasture strategically 
  • Plan supplementary feeding based on energy supply vs. demand 
  • Prevent unnecessary condition loss  

Access tables for the energy and protein requirements of sheep here and how much energy can sheep get from dry pastures here, to align your available feed, stocking rate, and joining CS targets.  

Key takeaway for producers 

Achieving the right CS at joining remains one of the most reliable ways to lift scanning rates and overall flock profitability. The most cost-effective strategy is simple: Build condition early, maintain it economically, and prioritise the animals most likely to deliver a return. 

More information

Articles That Might Interest You

Project Management Contractor
AWI is seeking applications for a Project Management Contractor to play a key role in the development of the Woolmark+ Nature Positive Farming Program. The contractor will provide hands-on project management and program development support to move the program from launch readiness through to rollout and preparation for scale. Read more
Digital & IT Project Manager
This role works closely with the General Manager Digital & IT and wider Digital & IT team to manage the successful delivery of digital and IT projects across AWI. The role is responsible for planning, coordinating, tracking and reporting project activity using agile methodology, best-practice project management processes and appropriate AI-enabled ways of working. Read more
Project Manager – Research
The Project Manager is responsible for the management of AWI funded projects and proposals associated with the Sustainable Profitable Sheep Production Portfolio. Read more